5th Reflective Journal for Technology and Language Learning
After last week I learned about principles in designing CALL, in these 8th and 9th sessions I learned about the ‘real’ example of CALL’s which has functions to teach listening and speaking skill.
As for technology to teach listening skill I explored some websites which provide listening skill practice program like Randall’s ESL Cyber Listening Lab and British Council-Learn English: Song and Lyric. These two websites I mentioned is the implementation of natural approach which proposed by Krashen and Terrel in 1983. This approach believes at two main things, comprehensible input and optimum affective state. It believes that to produce a good output in language learning process, learner should get an understandable input and free from anxiety, has good self confident and has good intrinsic motivation.
Both of the websites I mentioned before designing their website along with the natural approach view. With give a comprehensible input like in British Council-Learn English which gives input for young learner through song and animation and Randall’s website which provide listening skill practice program with contextual topic like conversation in telephone for adult learner. Both of the websites also elicit an optimal stage learning with provide a game and immediate test to examine learner understanding. The best thing is the correction of error is really instant but it won’t make learner feel ashamed if they did wrong.
Other technology to teach listening skill is based on TPR (Total Physical Response) which proposed by Asher. This technique has strong believes that learner shouldn’t be force to produce output if they are not ready yet. This faith seems obviously in the websites which use this technique like Live Action English Interactive and TPR games. For example in Live Action English Interactive website, it provides a lot of video which tell about a certain activity complete with the illustration. All teacher need to do are download the video, show the video in front of class and ask student to do pantomiming based on the video. Learner shouldn’t have to produce any outcome like utterances or writing.
Meanwhile in the 9th session I learned about technology to teach speaking, honestly I had high expectation to explore all the CALL’s to teach speaking skill. I was thinking I would find a high tech CALL which could recognize and assess people’s speaking skill in English accurately, fairly and immediately.
But then my high expectations kind of broken when I figure out that most of websites only provide programs to teach learners about the right pronunciation and repeat it by themselves alone. Some of websites provide facilitate to record someone’s voice but the there is no assessment or correction from the website. The only human and machine interaction exist is when the website record someone’s voice. Another bad point is some websites are ‘so heavy’ so it is not easy to open the website completely especially in my place which doesn’t have good internet connection.
Last I will end my reflection with say that actually I hope soon there is a CALL who can assess someone’s speaking skill accurately and I also hope internet connection in my place will get better and better.
11 komentar:
One thing we can learn from this subject is, personally for me, we should not rely only on technology. It's because the program and the software that applied there only on particular purpose, like what u said "Some of websites provide facilitate to record someone’s voice but the there is no assessment or correction from the website".
There is something that technology can't do anyhow :D Right???
how do you handle the student who make "their own activity" by the computer that we have provided for teaching and learning activity? it can distract the learning process, can't it?
Hi momo...
I agree with you... We cannot rely too much technology...
But I think in the future it is possible for language teacher and programmer to collaborate and making a certain appropriate program for language learner...
Hi Rindy... sure it'll distracted the teaching and learning process... That's why I think it is important to set a classroom agreement before... What do you say?
How can you cope the students who do exercise in website with use other people's answer? for example, s(h)e ask someone to do her/his exercise in website that you provide..
thanks for sharing Weni..
well, if you were a teacher what kind of website will you design to help your students' learning process?
will you cover four skills of students (listening, reading, writing and speaking)? why?
Hi Ayu...
Uhm...That is why for the very first time I will conduct the class in the classroom or lab when I held a very important test... Also I will set a classroom agreement first to prevent that thing to happen... and also I think even in the traditional assessment system the chance for someone cheat with asking someone else to do the assignment is still there... Does it answer your question?
Hi mbak Ira...
Thank you...n.n
Uhm.. honestly I'll design a website which provide a practice for student's listening skill (I want o focus)... Because there is so rare to find a website which provide input for listening skill...
Does it answer your question?
It is nice writing Weni, but I am wondering how to avoid cheating in doing the task that is provided in website?
Hi Ein... thank you...
well... actually I don't have idea I mean computer server cannot differentiate between the user 'who should conduct the test' and the user who isn't... That is why... for educational context I think it is better to held an important test in classroom..
Foe the online test if the provider of test and the test taker are online in the same time... I think it is possible to use web cam or skype..
What do you say?
absolutely helps me in reviewing the materials,,,,
thanks weni
keep spirit & smile
Posting Komentar